Reimplementing BG balance system

[Henhouse]

Reviving thread, can we please stay on topic and continue the discussion of this feature? I know the community is dying for balance in BGs and this is the solution. Instead the thread derails to typical flame wars.

[Gandraman]

Reviving thread, can we please stay on topic and continue the discussion of this feature? I know the community is dying for balance in BGs and this is the solution. Instead the thread derails to typical flame wars.

Eh man , i doubt this will balance the bg system ,because it isn't imba , at diferent hours diferent factions fill the queue more than others , it just the way it is , cept you make mixed faction battlegrounds, witch I don't like cuz i don't want to play with allyfages when im not on my ally chars. Btw i wanted to say that you did a nice job on huntards , you and that exigryho or whatever his name was . I didn;t reallt hate him just wanted to push him a bit , to fix huntards the most fcked up classes of all. anyways peace
I wish I started playing now on this server and not like twp years ago

[Ricekrispies]

I vote yes on this but I'd rather like to see you raising the amount of players to be in que for a battleground to start. For example, Arathi Basin doesn't function very well with only 8 players on each side. If you'd raise the requirement for a battleground to start from 8 to 13 for EoTS and AB and from 5 to 8 for WSG, we wouldn't have need for need for the feature you're suggesting. Group queing works and everyone is happy.

[foulacy]

Take it to the polls ! err jk.. implement it !

[Zapcraclepop]

Do it, at least test it out... If it doesn't work, bounce it back. But it simply sucks when it's 15v5 or 10v4 I don't care whose side you're on.
Even for the victors it's boring as crap, because the opposing team will likely hide (who can blame them?) and suddenly the game becomes a match of "Where's Waldo"

That's fun?

[Henhouse]

Do it, at least test it out... If it doesn't work, bounce it back. But it simply sucks when it's 15v5 or 10v4 I don't care whose side you're on.
Even for the victors it's boring as crap, because the opposing team will likely hide (who can blame them?) and suddenly the game becomes a match of "Where's Waldo"

That's fun?

Indeed, I think the good it will do will be very beneficial. I'll be implementing it soon.

[Biz]

Do it, at least test it out... If it doesn't work, bounce it back. But it simply sucks when it's 15v5 or 10v4 I don't care whose side you're on.
Even for the victors it's boring as crap, because the opposing team will likely hide (who can blame them?) and suddenly the game becomes a match of "Where's Waldo"

That's fun?

Indeed, I think the good it will do will be very beneficial. I'll be implementing it soon.

Good choice :)