Public Decision: BAN on multiboxing

Talk about anything here, related to Smolderforge or not.

Poll: Should multiboxing be banned?

Yes, ban it completely.
107
70%
No, do not ban it.
46
30%
 
Total votes: 153

Amgseret
Posts: 1567

Re: Public Decision: BAN on multiboxing

Post by Amgseret »

Well, I thought it was obvious why I dont want to ban them completely but lemme explain again :D

Freedom of choice.

Whats the best part at an instant lvl 70 fun server ? Ya can try totally different shit. So if somebody wants to roll X shamies and spam 1 button ? Well, fuck it, let him. As long the number of chars is limited, it doesnt make that big of a difference and its still fun for normal players to rape one.

Other + point is obvious too Id say, cash. Having some tard to donate 3x should make Hen a happy panda.

What is the problem with limit again ? Multiboxers are easy to spot and if ya see more than 3, ss > ban the faggots.

Hm, negative arguments make sense ofc but only seeing the current situation, my genius idea keeps the balance and freedom of choice.
Btw, I dont get the fun point really, for me its much more fun to 1vs3 a multiboxer than chasing some gay ass druid who is healed by other druids. Full buffed paladins that abuse fuckloads of shit arent any better either...OHAI XARU
Blue wrote:Yo Seret, can you untie Mayor?
Cube
Posts: 2551

Re: Public Decision: BAN on multiboxing

Post by Cube »

Amgseret wrote:Whats the best part at an instant lvl 70 fun server ?
To have fun. A lot of people doesn't really think multiboxers are fun. I would say that compared to the ones who do think it is fun, that would be the majority.
Amgseret wrote:Hm, negative arguments make sense ofc but only seeing the current situation, my genius idea keeps the balance and freedom of choice.
No, you limit the balance, and making people able to multibox doesn't enforce freedom of choice as much as it hurts the quality of the server. Having the freedom of choice to pick any class you want, gear it with the best the game has to offer, and do that over and over without much effort (and close to free swp/s4) is freedom enough. By far. Having multiboxers do the same isn't balanced, the gear choices on the server stretches the balance enough as it is.

Remove multiboxing still leaves freedom of choice, and makes the game more enjoyable for a lot of us.

And as said, it's either yes or no, still not yes or "wait, listen to this other irrelevant shitty idea that I have".
Amgseret wrote:Btw, I dont get the fun point really, for me its much more fun to 1vs3 a multiboxer than chasing some gay ass druid who is healed by other druids. Full buffed paladins that abuse fuckloads of shit arent any better either...OHAI XARU
Which is also irrelevant to the question at hand. You present multiple problems, and can actually solve one of them. But you say no because the other problems doesn't get solved as you see fit? Amphetamine logic.

Edit: Making sense and all that.
Balls, Cube, Deems, Google [Bot]
User avatar
Riski
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 620
Location: Everywhere...

Re: Public Decision: BAN on multiboxing

Post by Riski »

I'm going to have to agree with Cube on this one. The post debating multiboxing has been open for a year or so and if you had any thoughts or ideas that was the place to post them. This is a decision moment and as much as your thoughts could change our opinion, no one has presented a readily available solution to the problem other than "there are other problems that don't get fixed so why bother fixing this." Multiboxing has been and always will be a "problem" for one reason or another and we have a chance to fix them, its a ban or not and you should vote according. If you say yes it should be because you want a ban on it and if you say no its because you want us to do nothing about it.
Administrator - Forum Lurker / Heavyweight World Champ
- Co-Founder
Vanilla
Posts: 230
Location: Lithuania

Re: Public Decision: BAN on multiboxing

Post by Vanilla »

You voted for this option: Yes, ban it completely. 29 votes

No, do not ban it. 6 votes

what're those discussions about? those numbers are all we need.
Amgseret
Posts: 1567

Re: Public Decision: BAN on multiboxing

Post by Amgseret »

Vanilla wrote:You voted for this option: Yes, ban it completely. 29 votes

No, do not ban it. 6 votes

what're those discussions about? those numbers are all we need.
Calm your tits, its not over yet. Come on Passion faggots, time to voooote.
Blue wrote:Yo Seret, can you untie Mayor?
Pallyofhell
Posts: 371

Re: Public Decision: BAN on multiboxing

Post by Pallyofhell »

Amgseret wrote:
Vanilla wrote:You voted for this option: Yes, ban it completely. 29 votes

No, do not ban it. 6 votes

what're those discussions about? those numbers are all we need.
Calm your tits, its not over yet. Come on Passion faggots, time to voooote.
pfff passion fags wont do anything but bitch and we all know it
EPEEN TOO STRONK!
Mynce
Donor
Donor
Posts: 1360

Re: Public Decision: BAN on multiboxing

Post by Mynce »

anyone wanna gamble ?
i bet 5$ those are all passion members voting no.
Peace and serenity :
http://www.smolderforge.com/forums/view ... f=4&t=8012


-Selling account 25?ó?ÇÜ?¼ pm if interested-
Sarah
Posts: 55

Re: Public Decision: BAN on multiboxing

Post by Sarah »

Mynce wrote:anyone wanna gamble ?
i bet 5$ those are all passion members voting no.
Seret included. no offense negro <3
Amgseret
Posts: 1567

Re: Public Decision: BAN on multiboxing

Post by Amgseret »

Passion > fagcopter

KGO
Blue wrote:Yo Seret, can you untie Mayor?
Fleepz
Posts: 30

Re: Public Decision: BAN on multiboxing

Post by Fleepz »

Mynce wrote:anyone wanna gamble ?
i bet 5$ those are all passion members voting no.
Or maybe me and other multiboxers
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest