unilateral gms ?
Re: unilateral gms ?
I'm completely objective when it comes to handle situations with my GM character. I don't have any preferences. If you received a ban it's not because I hate you/dislike you, it was because your broke the rules. In fact, I don't hate you at all after all this problem. That's why I recommended a fresh start with your no-banned account ;)
Retired Game Master
Re: unilateral gms ?
thats why i see people calling each other niggers dick stains faggots n shit on LFG chat when youre on. Sir youre full of shit.Oh yeah none of em was even warned neither by you neither by white... ^____^ so keep ur good gm stories for ur self sir.You by your self even stated that only third ban should be perm. Youre just fuckin around with me by sitting on my nutts.Vord wrote:I'm completely objective when it comes to handle situations with my GM character. I don't have any preferences. If you received a ban it's not because I hate you/dislike you, it was because your broke the rules. In fact, I don't hate you at all after all this problem. That's why I recommended a fresh start with your no-banned account ;)
Re: unilateral gms ?
Instead of all this spam, can't you Mr. Vord go check how many times he has been banned ? If he has been banned just once then you can just change it to suspension and he will be right back on the server.. if not then I guess we wait for Hen to decide.Fridge wrote:You by your self even stated that only third ban should be perm.
Re: unilateral gms ?
There's something to be said about people who cooperate with our staff. If your blatant disrespect for GM Vord throughout this thread and the previous was supposed to somehow make me want to assist you more, I can assure you it's done the opposite.
It's my belief that you should have received a 72-hour suspension for a second offense of the same kind; a step up from your first suspension. Having received a warning should have prevented this altogether. Since I was not there to witness the conversations taking place, you appeal this to me, yet I was not there. So for me to make an informed decision isn't easy to be fair to both sides. I would still agree a suspension was deserved on this case since usually third offenses should be when an account is finally closed. On exception for severe offenses such as hacking, win-trading or any other forms of cheating, etc.
With that said, I will leave the decision on whether or not to lower this to a suspension or leave it the same entirely at Vord's discretion.
It's my belief that you should have received a 72-hour suspension for a second offense of the same kind; a step up from your first suspension. Having received a warning should have prevented this altogether. Since I was not there to witness the conversations taking place, you appeal this to me, yet I was not there. So for me to make an informed decision isn't easy to be fair to both sides. I would still agree a suspension was deserved on this case since usually third offenses should be when an account is finally closed. On exception for severe offenses such as hacking, win-trading or any other forms of cheating, etc.
With that said, I will leave the decision on whether or not to lower this to a suspension or leave it the same entirely at Vord's discretion.
Administrator - Project Lead / Server Management / Core Development
Re: unilateral gms ?
I did stop after i got warned n yet i got banned after the warn.. when i havent said anything to him anymore. And what i wanted by creating this topic was an unilateral GM that would give me a punishment from his point of view.Henhouse wrote:There's something to be said about people who cooperate with our staff. If your blatant disrespect for GM Vord throughout this thread and the previous was supposed to somehow make me want to assist you more, I can assure you it's done the opposite.
It's my belief that you should have received a 72-hour suspension for a second offense of the same kind; a step up from your first suspension. Having received a warning should have prevented this altogether. Since I was not there to witness the conversations taking place, you appeal this to me, yet I was not there. So for me to make an informed decision isn't easy to be fair to both sides. I would still agree a suspension was deserved on this case since usually third offenses should be when an account is finally closed. On exception for severe offenses such as hacking, win-trading or any other forms of cheating, etc.
With that said, I will leave the decision on whether or not to lower this to a suspension or leave it the same entirely at Vord's discretion.
Re: unilateral gms ?
I've decided (because I feel too good sometimes) That it will be replaced with a 3 day suspension instead of the permanent ban. But let me warn you, break the rules just one more time and I promise I wont be as good as I am being right now.
I would also like an apology for your behavior before any other action is taken.
I would also like an apology for your behavior before any other action is taken.
Retired Game Master
Re: unilateral gms ?
My deepest apologies kind sir.Vord wrote:I've decided (because I feel too good sometimes) That it will be replaced with a 3 day suspension instead of the permanent ban. But let me warn you, break the rules just one more time and I promise I wont be as good as I am being right now.
I would also like an apology for your behavior before any other action is taken.
Re: unilateral gms ?
So in the end it, is subjective :D
YOU take the rule only serious when it comes to staff. So why having a point, why you do it like that, its still not really subjective, since there should be no difference for applying rules, that is decided by the status of the "victim". (and from my pov, not really fair/needed either as long its just trolling and not blunt insulting) But of course I am not in the position to call it right/wrong and by all means, not trying to tell you how to do your job, just sayn.
Mr. Fridge had a nice point about you having ignore + mute too. So even more option, than a normal player.
Yes I agree that he broke the rule couple times already and deserved the previous suspensions but if its true that he got a warning and stopped after it, banning him without repeating the offense sounds at least harsh.
Eww, looks like a happy end anyway, how boring. :D
YOU take the rule only serious when it comes to staff. So why having a point, why you do it like that, its still not really subjective, since there should be no difference for applying rules, that is decided by the status of the "victim". (and from my pov, not really fair/needed either as long its just trolling and not blunt insulting) But of course I am not in the position to call it right/wrong and by all means, not trying to tell you how to do your job, just sayn.
Mr. Fridge had a nice point about you having ignore + mute too. So even more option, than a normal player.
Yes I agree that he broke the rule couple times already and deserved the previous suspensions but if its true that he got a warning and stopped after it, banning him without repeating the offense sounds at least harsh.
Eww, looks like a happy end anyway, how boring. :D
Blue wrote:Yo Seret, can you untie Mayor?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest