Unfair play by Mirok

[Svenyo]

So Mirok and Agarwen just qued with their 2100 team into a 1500 spr team (Komatbc&Demonpro). Agarwen got killed and they basicially lost 30 rating. But the spriest of the spr team decided not to kill mirok because they would lose to much rating and left the game. Mirok, being the snitch he is, just 1v1d the rogue and won. Now this is really unfair to all other teams playing legit, they would have lost like 30 rating points for sure.



yeah mirok pretty much asked them to leave, I hope their team gets disqualified

[Apuclevercow]

It's not unfair, just an aspect of the 2s state on every TBC server.

[Hartun]

It's not unfair

What if you were in that position? I think it is unfair and disqualification is pretty good "punishment"

[Apuclevercow]

So you can disqualify almost every arena top player and probably remove some titles.

Once I was against rule and sprintex, we were wining (the enemy cow was down) but my rogue mate decided to leave without even asking me if we can leave, I followed him not to be a dawg.
So I was in that position, and afaik I didn't make a forum post for this. He didn't intentionally use a bug/hack and we can't call that wintrade.
The current state of arena is so bad that merely this issue is really nothing.

[Balls]

That's essentially match-fixing but literally everyone does it because internet points are of much importance

(you have to admire the ingenuity behind orchestating wins for your team even when you lose, but that's a much deeper problem by itself.)

lastly, i don't really get why you'd even bother whining about losing "30 points" or whatever. you don't want to lose the points? don't lose the game. that's how it's intended to happen.

[Agarwen]

Still i dont know why priest left and then mirok killed rogue 1v1. Mirok didin't ask him to leave on whisper i think. I don't care if we lost cus we can get this rating again so fast by killing all 2v2 teams here ;p

But if in ur opinion guys it was unfair just delete our team or idk.

[Balls]

That'd be a pretty ridic overreaction too. If he wasn't asked to leave then there's literally nothing wrong. If he was, however, then I see it as match-fixing. You guys were there and know what went down, so it's not really up to me to speculate.

[Hartun]

lastly, i don't really get why you'd even bother whining about losing "30 points" or whatever. you don't want to lose the points? don't lose the game. that's how it's intended to happen.

Its 30 rtg and i dont know what's the big deal also, if you are high rated (2k+) imo you shouldn't lose to a sub 1k7 team..

[Apuclevercow]

lastly, i don't really get why you'd even bother whining about losing "30 points" or whatever. you don't want to lose the points? don't lose the game. that's how it's intended to happen.

Its 30 rtg and i dont know what's the big deal also, if you are high rated (2k+) imo you shouldn't lose to a sub 1k7 team..

I agree for the 30 points, especially because the points we can win were raised but what you are saying doesn't make any sense Hartun.
Unless if you completely outgear the enemy team, a single mistake or just the rng can make you lose a game. Imagine if they resist twice a cyclone, the game becomes totally fucked up.

[Wacco]

logs