Page 1 of 2

Queu Random Battlegrounds

Posted: 26 Jul 2012, 13:24
by Firstaidkit
Oh come on start the bg's already on Wrath and get out of that shitty Dire Maul Arena it's fucking boring. I wanna play Strand of the Acients or any other battlegrounds.

Just queu up already..
WoWScrnShot_072612_131541.jpg
We need population, join us on Wrath!

Re: Queu Random Battlegrounds

Posted: 26 Jul 2012, 17:11
by Imperium
go back to tbc

Re: Queu Random Battlegrounds

Posted: 26 Jul 2012, 17:15
by Mayore
Imperium wrote:go back to tbc

says who

Re: Queu Random Battlegrounds

Posted: 26 Jul 2012, 19:08
by Nii
Imperium wrote:go back to tbc
pls no

Re: Queu Random Battlegrounds

Posted: 26 Jul 2012, 19:21
by Mayore
Nii wrote:
Imperium wrote:go back to tbc
pls no

you should go wotlk

im srs

Re: Queu Random Battlegrounds

Posted: 26 Jul 2012, 19:28
by Overdozze
If people fight in Dire Maul that does not mean that they are not in queue....also,if they want to play Dire Maul and not join a queue ...you're not mad at who you're supposed to be.Let them be and enjoy videos of strand of the ancients or isle of conquest.1080p works wonders.

Re: Queu Random Battlegrounds

Posted: 26 Jul 2012, 19:39
by Vanilla
if hen would have returned it as it was before ,bonus honor for wsg, there would be atleast few bg's in a day.

P.s: there was no bg's in 3days ;)

Re: Queu Random Battlegrounds

Posted: 26 Jul 2012, 20:25
by Overdozze
Vanilla wrote:P.s: there was no bg's in 3days ;)
Which is a normal outcome of the decisions that were made.
Another problem is that if there are like 4-5 wrath in X team and 1-2 or 0 in team Y..and team Y gets gy farmed/raped/necrolagnia,thanatophilia-ed..do you think that players from the Y team would want to requeue or even queue up when they see the wrathful people's name in /who?I highly doubt it.Solutions at this time are very scarce.It's too bad since it started out so awesome with 120 (my /who peak) eager players.I doubt it's their fault they left as much as the quality they found.
Maybe just keep shit ideas like Dire Maul alive and focus on PvE.Script the PvE content....hope for more players.....hope for growth....and then hope they would turn and populate the PvP area.(just a retarded thought)

Re: Queu Random Battlegrounds

Posted: 26 Jul 2012, 20:44
by Firstaidkit
Overdozze wrote:
Vanilla wrote:P.s: there was no bg's in 3days ;)
Which is a normal outcome of the decisions that were made.
Another problem is that if there are like 4-5 wrath in X team and 1-2 or 0 in team Y..and team Y gets gy farmed/raped/necrolagnia,thanatophilia-ed..do you think that players from the Y team would want to requeue or even queue up when they see the wrathful people's name in /who?I highly doubt it.Solutions at this time are very scarce.It's too bad since it started out so awesome with 120 (my /who peak) eager players.I doubt it's their fault they left as much as the quality they found.
Maybe just keep shit ideas like Dire Maul alive and focus on PvE.Script the PvE content....hope for more players.....hope for growth....and then hope they would turn and populate the PvP area.(just a retarded thought)
True story, I have to agree with that.

Re: Queu Random Battlegrounds

Posted: 26 Jul 2012, 21:57
by Felixx
Firstaidkit wrote:
Overdozze wrote:
Vanilla wrote:P.s: there was no bg's in 3days ;)
Which is a normal outcome of the decisions that were made.
Another problem is that if there are like 4-5 wrath in X team and 1-2 or 0 in team Y..and team Y gets gy farmed/raped/necrolagnia,thanatophilia-ed..do you think that players from the Y team would want to requeue or even queue up when they see the wrathful people's name in /who?I highly doubt it.Solutions at this time are very scarce.It's too bad since it started out so awesome with 120 (my /who peak) eager players.I doubt it's their fault they left as much as the quality they found.
Maybe just keep shit ideas like Dire Maul alive and focus on PvE.Script the PvE content....hope for more players.....hope for growth....and then hope they would turn and populate the PvP area.(just a retarded thought)
True story, I have to agree with that.