CF BGs is an awful idea

Talk about anything here, related to Smolderforge or not.
Vicarious
Posts: 223

Re: CF BGs is an awful idea

Post by Vicarious »

Apuclevercow wrote:Greetings,

As many players might notice, there is between 0 and 1 SC done per day since Hen made some terrible (awesome) modifications. Before that these modifications were done, we could usually see people saying that there will be less and less players on the server if Hen makes modifications, they were wrong : We can see more players waiting in Tanaris for BGs.

However, all these new guys sleeping in Tanaris are on Horde side, it means that they're usually stealing my holy spot.
The active part of the Administration team can't tell us that there isn't a lack of alliance players for BGs : Whenever we que, there are always 3-5x more horde players than alliance players.
Alterac Valley is THE unique BG we can easily do, because it's at the hour almost kids from One Spot are playing.

What can you/we do against this ?
  • Oblige people to roll alliance ?
  • Unban/Unmute Ruuren again and again ?
  • Mute FAK ?
  • Restore Headway's chars over and over again ?
  • Tell Pastore that no one wants to buy his 3 S4 warriors ?
  • Create a black skin for gnomes which would make them interesting to play with ?
  • Do a week of testing for CF BGs ?
  • Give to players a free way to transfer to a race of the other side once/twice per day ?
  • Nothing ?
I think CF BG's would be excellent honestly, I'd happily play with alliance and against horde, it removes the fucking idiotic idea that there's a difference between the two on an instant 70 private server besides how they look and their racials. In CF BG's there's no more dumb "alliance win all bg is so best much awesome" (or vice versa), it's just "whoever has the better players win all so best much awesome". I don't understand the arguments against it at all.
Apuclevercow wrote:The main question is, who is viacaris ?
User avatar
Apuclevercow
Posts: 1349

Re: CF BGs is an awful idea

Post by Apuclevercow »

Zapcraclepop wrote:
Apuclevercow wrote:In my mind, AV is the unique hour when there are lots of gnomes playing. Giving them a real HK farming battleground to make them staying instead of leaving is a nice idea.
Did you even read what I wrote? Idc about AV hour, except to try and get the daily done. It's the BG following AV I have an issue with. There, I even underlined the passage so you could fucking read it this time. you're welcome.
Wait... what ? What isn't understandable on what I've written ?
I just meant that there are a lot of alliance players during the AV hour (as I even stated on my first post) and then, if we give them after this hour, a real interesting BG, they'll not leave but they'll stay.
AV is already a "real HK farming battleground", my post obviously implied that I was talking about the following BG even if I didn't say this word.
Zapcraclepop wrote: Lastly, I don't have to think about CF. Henry already put his foot down. You're better off asking him for glaives.
The SC-talking part in my thread is obviously here for something.
Henhouse wasn't going to do these modifications afaik but he did it.
There is always a way for people to change their mind.
Last edited by Apuclevercow on 17 Feb 2014, 09:23, edited 2 times in total.
ah
Dntryme
Posts: 415

Re: CF BGs is an awful idea

Post by Dntryme »

Apuclevercow wrote:
  • Do a week of testing for CF BGs ?
This.
Just kidding, "faction wars".
User avatar
Apuclevercow
Posts: 1349

Re: CF BGs is an awful idea

Post by Apuclevercow »

Dntryme wrote:
Apuclevercow wrote:
  • Do a week of testing for CF BGs ?
This.
Just kidding, "faction wars".
It's right, Hen is that RP fanboy, always writing many sentences before attacking some putrid undeads; to get them fighting in his side is just awful !
ah
User avatar
Apuclevercow
Posts: 1349

Re: CF BGs is an awful idea

Post by Apuclevercow »

daily bump.
ah
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest