Talent Builds Website
- Apuclevercow
- Posts: 1349
Re: Talent Builds Website
Create different tabs, one for PvE specs and another one for PvP.
For some classes, there is many PvP possibilities whereas there is only a single (low variable) spec for PvE
I.e balance/resto druids : For PvP I take the fcharge (and then I also take Furor) but some don't make this choice b/c they prefere the basic wrath rotation vs casters/healers.
DS spec : something like 34/0/27, you got MF, DS, NG and NS in resto tree which is quite nice to play in arena and also on battlegrounds, not appreciated in PvE. ;D
For some classes, there is many PvP possibilities whereas there is only a single (low variable) spec for PvE
I.e balance/resto druids : For PvP I take the fcharge (and then I also take Furor) but some don't make this choice b/c they prefere the basic wrath rotation vs casters/healers.
DS spec : something like 34/0/27, you got MF, DS, NG and NS in resto tree which is quite nice to play in arena and also on battlegrounds, not appreciated in PvE. ;D
ah
-
- Posts: 12
Re: Talent Builds Website
Thanks for your feedback! Sounds like a good idea to me.. ill get to work on it as soon as possible.. thanks :DApuclevercow wrote:Create different tabs, one for PvE specs and another one for PvP.
For some classes, there is many PvP possibilities whereas there is only a single (low variable) spec for PvE
I.e balance/resto druids : For PvP I take the fcharge (and then I also take Furor) but some don't make this choice b/c they prefere the basic wrath rotation vs casters/healers.
DS spec : something like 34/0/27, you got MF, DS, NG and NS in resto tree which is quite nice to play in arena and also on battlegrounds, not appreciated in PvE. ;D
Save Time.........See It My Way.
Re: Talent Builds Website
Still a bit fucked up, but better than before. Gj though, keep it up.
Re: Talent Builds Website
Selitha wrote:Still a bit fucked up, but better than before. Gj though, keep it up.
big player))
-
- Posts: 12
Re: Talent Builds Website
well, thanks for the feedback! I have to as though.. what do you think is wrong with it? What would you do to make it better? Thanks! :DSelitha wrote:Still a bit fucked up, but better than before. Gj though, keep it up.
Save Time.........See It My Way.
Re: Talent Builds Website
The Paladin specs are fine now, good job. :)
Arthur C. Clarke - "Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying."
- Apuclevercow
- Posts: 1349
Re: Talent Builds Website
http://crusaderswow.weebly.com/uploads/ ... 0_orig.png
Beware to do not take more borked screenshots. ;D
Beware to do not take more borked screenshots. ;D
ah
-
- Posts: 12
Re: Talent Builds Website
oops! Thanks for letting me know I didn't notice that! Will fix that right after I post this reply :DApuclevercow wrote:http://crusaderswow.weebly.com/uploads/ ... 0_orig.png
Beware to do not take more borked screenshots. ;D
And thanks to all the good compliments!! Thanks guys!
Save Time.........See It My Way.
Re: Talent Builds Website
what you saidMayore wrote:Selitha wrote:Still a bit fucked up, but better than before. Gj though, keep it up.
big player))
Looking up only priest specs, disc one is fine, but your shadow spec is like mixed up for pvp and pve, if you're going for pve why would you spec silence+improved vampiric embrace? And if it's pvp, you don't need shadow power. Disc tree in shadow spec - why improved inner fire? Still can't get if it's supposed to be pve or pvp spec.garrett182 wrote:well, thanks for the feedback! I have to as though.. what do you think is wrong with it? What would you do to make it better? Thanks! :DSelitha wrote:Still a bit fucked up, but better than before. Gj though, keep it up.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest