Firstaidkit vs Ezatt?
- Apuclevercow
- Posts: 1349
Re: Firstaidkit vs Ezatt?
@fak and can we also talk about FAP and wards ?
Don't talk about swp items, it's sad that players have to fully wear this kind of gear to carry their skill but we can't do more as it's almost 50% of active players, removing swp gears doesn't worth it.
CF BGs mitigate this issue.
Don't talk about swp items, it's sad that players have to fully wear this kind of gear to carry their skill but we can't do more as it's almost 50% of active players, removing swp gears doesn't worth it.
CF BGs mitigate this issue.
ah
Re: Firstaidkit vs Ezatt?
That's some solid reasoning right there.Apuclevercow wrote:@fak and can we also talk about FAP and wards ?
Don't talk about swp items, it's sad that players have to fully wear this kind of gear to carry their skill but we can't do more as it's almost 50% of active players, removing swp gears doesn't worth it.
CF BGs mitigate this issue.
lol
Balls, Cube, Deems, Google [Bot]
- Apuclevercow
- Posts: 1349
Re: Firstaidkit vs Ezatt?
By mitigate I mean reducing the impact, removing swp gears will also remove more than 1/2 of active players directly/indirectly, when CF BGs mitigate the issue created by swp gears without any side effect.
ah
Re: Firstaidkit vs Ezatt?
what? what? what? what?Apuclevercow wrote:when CF BGs mitigate the issue created by swp gears without any side effect.
Google [Bot]
Re: Firstaidkit vs Ezatt?
Cross faction bg's will have no impact on that whatsoever. It'll reduce queue times, and have a slight impact on class distribution overall. You'll still be stuck with the gear level and the consumable spamming. That's another problem, for another discussion.Apuclevercow wrote:By mitigate I mean reducing the impact, removing swp gears will also remove more than 1/2 of active players directly/indirectly, when CF BGs mitigate the issue created by swp gears without any side effect.
Balls, Cube, Deems, Google [Bot]
-
- Posts: 201
Re: Firstaidkit vs Ezatt?
Cross faction bgs do not tackle the swp gear issue at all.
It's not the great solution you're looking for, however I think its a good step
It's not the great solution you're looking for, however I think its a good step
Smelgor # 1
- Apuclevercow
- Posts: 1349
Re: Firstaidkit vs Ezatt?
@deems -when+whereas
@cube @rottingham a part of the issue is that horde players mostly think that Alliance is totally abusing swp gears and the alliance players mostly think that Horde is abusing swp gears. With CF BGs, all will finally stop thinking it's a matter of faction, moreover with this feature, BGs must be more balanced, that's why it'll reduce the impact of swp gears.
@cube @rottingham a part of the issue is that horde players mostly think that Alliance is totally abusing swp gears and the alliance players mostly think that Horde is abusing swp gears. With CF BGs, all will finally stop thinking it's a matter of faction, moreover with this feature, BGs must be more balanced, that's why it'll reduce the impact of swp gears.
ah
Re: Firstaidkit vs Ezatt?
Apuclevercow wrote:@deems -when+whereas
@cube @rottingham a part of the issue is that horde players mostly think that Alliance is totally abusing swp gears and the alliance players mostly think that Horde is abusing swp gears. With CF BGs, all will finally stop thinking it's a matter of faction, moreover with this feature, BGs must be more balanced, that's why it'll reduce the impact of swp gears.

Balls, Cube, Deems, Google [Bot]
Re: Firstaidkit vs Ezatt?
Apuclevercow wrote: @cube @rottingham a part of the issue is that horde players mostly think that Alliance is totally abusing swp gears and the alliance players mostly think that Horde is abusing swp gears. With CF BGs, all will finally stop thinking it's a matter of faction, moreover with this feature, BGs must be more balanced, that's why it'll reduce the impact of swp gears.

Google [Bot]
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 1 guest